rob.rambaud@gmail.com
rob.rambaud@gmail.com
Highway 109/100
In the view of many, the MODOT Hwy 100 resurfacing project is a spectacular success. Federal & MODOT funds combined to cover most project costs; we paid the leftover fractions.
Other infrastructure
Village Green
More than any other St. Louis suburb, our green spaces make Wildwood a great place to live.
Internet Access
Poor-to-nonexistent Internet access was an unacceptable drain on rural folks Quality of Life.
Unfortunately, there's still more work to be done.
City Website and Internet use
Erosion and Flooding
I’ve participated in Wildwood Watershed Erosion Task Force (WETF) since it began.

Proudly helping to cut the ribbon for the MO Hwy 100 Resurfacing and Safety Improvement Project.
Residents including myself refuse to sacrifice future quality of life to promote development.
No City Council Member has worked harder to reduce aesthetic and environmental impacts.
Town Center represents less than 2% of Wildwood area.
IN WARD 6, THERE HAS ONLY BEEN ONE SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT SINCE 2020.
I currently participate in the 3rd Wildwood Master Plan 10-year Revision Committee.
I also participate in the development of the City’s first Historic Preservation Master Plan.
Veteran Recognition
Sign regulations, including LED signage: I OPPOSE visual and light pollution. Period.

"This isn't a pretty picture."
Wildwood Economic Development
"Wildwood Luxury Living" in Town Center, Real Estate Tax relief
Budget Priorities
St. Louis Community College
Government Finance Officers Association awards to Wildwood:
Email privacy, “open records” requests, and Council Member communication with residents

"We deserve fiscal discipline, intelligent analysis, competence, and integrity from our Government.
Tree City USA
We earned this designation from the Arbor Day Foundation, recognizing the City’s ongoing commitment to urban forestry, environmental stewardship, and sustainable community practices.
Community and Veteran Recognition
Public Safety
The City launched the Safe Speeds, Safe Streets Initiative.

First, to be clear, I treasure whitetail deer. I actually “name” random local deer, and I fret about them in bad weather.
MY OATH DEMANDS that I consider all residents, not just folks who think like me.
As a conservationist, I strongly support healthy herd density, but I share that common ground with informed hunters, gardeners, nature lovers, health officials, and others alike.
I've hunted, fished, gathered and roamed this area my whole life. I took my first deer, an Ozark rite of passage, in 1968 when Missouri "only" had 300,000 deer. Mom took her first deer in 1946 when there were only 15,000 in the whole state, and she took her last of a great many - a 12-pointer - in her 80’s. Dad's remarkable half-century of success was locally well-known.
Now, MO has 1.8 million deer. Local densities are up to TEN TIMES the MO Dept of Conservation (MDC) maximum recommended density of 10-20 deer/sq. mile.
Nature, in balance, is sparse. We shouldn't expect to see deer every day. If we do, there is something very wrong that is bad for society and bad for deer.
Unsustainable deer numbers have led to the following problems:
Board of Public Safety (BPS) called this problem a top priority, and a city-wide survey revealed that nearly 3/4 of residents support action.
The City carefully studied every known control option for several years, seeking the least-cost solution that can solve the problem in a way that most residents could accept.
MDC, WPD, STLCO Public Health, Wildlife Biologists and other sources provided guidance.
Decision parameters were:
The City Administration and Public Works Committee determined that a professional cull was the only feasible option. Wildwood was fortunate to engage a world-class, scientist-led wildlife management nonprofit.
In the first two years of this fully funded five-year program:
Also noteworthy:
Note that the most strongly considered alternative was hunting. From the very beginning, I have advocated for asking local hunters to help. Having been in that community for seven decades, I have also urged caution because the unfortunate reality is that the skill levels vary widely. Success rates for MDC Managed Archery Hunts with full participation averages below 15%. (per MDC)
But this is not a question of intent or individual skill—it is a question of scale, structure, and what actually works in a suburban environment.
No suburban program has demonstrated, in comparable circumstances, the ability to achieve and sustain anything approaching the level of population reduction required here.
Even with the most skilled hunters, all-in costs would be much less predictable and likely very close to the professionally contracted rate, even before considering the added liabilities the City would be compelled to take on.
More importantly for resident quality of life, the operational footprint would be enormous
versus
Please trust that there's much more to this difficult issue. As a scientist, conservationist, wildlife lover & local hunter who works for everyone, this is among the most analyzed, scientifically and socially sound decisions I've seen.

Deer may eat grass, but do not digest it. They will starve in grassy fields. Corn is also very bad.